Bowman v. Payne
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought to obtain a judgment of the court that plaintiffs are the owners of a right to the use of the water of Mill Creek flowing through a certain ditch, which is described in the complaint, for the irrigation of their lands, and that defendant has no right or interest in said water except as to that part which drains and flows off of plaintiffs’ said lands into the South Fork of Fitzhugh Creek, and that said defendant and his successors be enjoined from interfering in any manner with the use- of said water by plaintiffs, or of impeding or obstructing the flow of the same or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Goodenow v. EwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Douglass v. ToddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Champion v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Stepp v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bank of Loretto v. BoboAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Wallace v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Estate of Boller v. BollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- City of Petaluma v. HickeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Williams v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991