Legal Opinion

Eagan, B.N.F. v. Douglas

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 7, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.

This is an action to recover for injuries suffered by the plaintiff by reason of having been struck by the defendant’s automobile, and comes here upon exceptions by the defendant. The only question necessary to consider is whether the evidence made a case for the jury on the issue of plaintiff’s contributory negligence, which is raised by an exception to the denial of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

The accident happened at about 9.30 in the forenoon of Sunday, January 10, 1933, upon the marble bridge in the village of Proctor. This bridge is one hundred and seventy-five feet long…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Steele v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. Howley v. KantorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  3. Wentworth v. Town of WaterburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  4. Aiken v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  5. Mertens v. Lake Shore Yellow Cab & Transfer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Duchaine, B.N.F. v. RaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  2. McKirryher v. YagerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Farrell v. GreeneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  4. Izor v. BrighamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  5. Colburn v. FrostSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API