Legal Opinion

Dee v. City of Peru

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1931No. 20529. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

delivered-the opinion of the court:

This cause is here on a certificate of importance of the Appellate Court for the Second District. Appellant seeks to reverse the judgment of that court affirming the judgment of the circuit court of LaSalle county in an action for damages for the death of appellee’s intestate, Joseph G. Dee, caused by drowning when the automobile in which he was riding as a passenger was driven off a bridge into the Illinois river at Peru through an opening occasioned by the turning of the bridge draw-span. The declaration charges negligence on the part of the appellant city…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schlauder v. Chicago & Southern Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Pienta v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Hinchliffe v. Wenig Teaming Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Wilson v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Greenwald v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Mort v. WalterIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Grubb v. Illinois Terminal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Pennington v. McLeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Zank v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Carter v. WinterIllinois Supreme Court · 1965

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API