Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marcos Poventud v. City of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 16, 2014No. 12-1011-cvPublished

1DissentDebra Ann Livingston, Circuit Judge

Until today, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and its progeny represented a safeguard against the miscarriage of justice. In this Circuit — at least until such time as today’s error is corrected — Brady now includes, with our imprimatur, the right to recompense for a denial of the opportunity to commit perjury more successfully.

I concur fully in Judge Jacobs’s powerful dissent, which explains how the majority effectively (but unjustifiably) inters Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), as it relates to convictions obtained…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API