United States v. Denney
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CARMICHAEL, Judge:
Appellant was tried in absentia by a special court-martial consisting of officer members. Contrary to his pleas, he was convicted of two specifications of larceny in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (1982). Appellant was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for six months, and to forfeit $447.00 pay per month for six months. The convening authority approved the sentence.
This court specified the following issue to be briefed by defense and government appellate counsel:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. WingartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. WarrenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. CourtneyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. DelaneyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Chief Warrant Officer Four ELMER F. HOFFMAN, IIIArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. NixonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. LaneUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998