Legal Opinion

United States v. Denney

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 28, 1989No. ACMR 8800897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CARMICHAEL, Judge:

Appellant was tried in absentia by a special court-martial consisting of officer members. Contrary to his pleas, he was convicted of two specifications of larceny in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (1982). Appellant was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for six months, and to forfeit $447.00 pay per month for six months. The convening authority approved the sentence.

This court specified the following issue to be briefed by defense and government appellate counsel:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. WingartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. WarrenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. CourtneyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. DelaneyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Chief Warrant Officer Four ELMER F. HOFFMAN, IIIArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  2. United States v. NixonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. LaneUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API