Asman v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Petitioner appeals after the trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this post-conviction relief proceeding under ORS 138.510 to 138.680. On appeal, petitioner makes only one assignment of error— he contends that the post-conviction court erred when it denied his motion for summary judgment under ORCP 47. The threshold issue before us is whether petitioner’s assignment of error is reviewable. We conclude that it is not and therefore affirm.
The following facts frame the above issue. Petitioner was convicted of harassment in the underlying case. ORS 166.065(l)(a)(A).…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Payless Drug Stores Northwest v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Eden Gate, Inc. v. D&L Excavating & Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- To v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Hoy v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Garrison v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Frontgate Properties, LLC v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Birdnest Mobile Estates v. MCH Property ManagementCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023