Legal Opinion

Carney v. Carney

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided May 29, 2012No. 2010-CA-00646-COAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Howard Carney III appeals the chancery court’s judgment awarding Andrea Leigh Bell Carney the full use, title, and possession of the marital home, along with all of the equity in the home. He *455argues that he is entitled to one-half of the equity in the marital home. He also argues that the chancellor erred listing his unvalued social security benefits under his share of the equitable distribution. Upon review, we find no error and affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. Andrea and Howard were married on November 20, 1998, and separated on November 26, 2008. Two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hemsley v. HemsleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bell v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Newsom v. NewsomMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Boutwell v. BoutwellMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carney v. CarneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Howard Wilson Carney, III v. Andrea Leigh Bell CarneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Howard Wilson Carney, III v. Andrea Leigh Bell CarneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Howard Wilson Carney, III v. Andrea Leigh Bell CarneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API