Legal Opinion

Carney v. Carney

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2013No. 2010-CT-00646-SCTPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*436 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

PIERCE, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Howard Carney III and Andrea Leigh Bell Carney obtained a divorce on the ground of irreconcilable differences in the Warren County Chancery Court. They asked the chancery court to determine child support, alimony, equitable distribution of assets, and attorney’s fees. The chancery court determined child support, divided the marital estate, considered alimony but declined to award it, and ordered Howard to pay $5,000 toward Andrea’s attorney’s fees. Howard appealed and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Carney v. Carney, 112 So.3d 453…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McKee v. McKeeMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hemsley v. HemsleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bell v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drake L. Lewis v. Tonia D. Lewis PagelMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Matthew Burnham v. Dana BurnhamMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Howard Wilson Carney, III v. Andrea Leigh Bell CarneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Clifford Michael Lockhart v. Stella Payton LockhartMississippi Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Howard Wilson Carney, III v. Andrea Leigh Bell CarneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API