Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Nicholas Olaf Kjolsrud, Loni Kay Kambitsch

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 18, 2016No. 2 CA-CR 2015-0230 - 2 CA-CR 2015-0231 (consolidated)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge:

¶ 1 Appellees Loni Kambitsch and Nicholas Kjolsrud were charged with multiple drug-related offenses based on drugs and drug paraphernalia seized from their vehicle after a traffic stop. Relying, in part, on Rodriguez v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1609, 191 L.Ed.2d 492 (2015), the trial court granted Kambitsch and Kjolsrud’s motion to suppress the drug evidence, finding continued detention by a sheriffs deputy to conduct a drug-detection-dog investigation after the completed traffic stop was not based on reasonable suspicion. The state dismissed the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Kyle Andrew StollCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2018
  3. State v. UrreaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  4. State of Arizona v. Asalia Guadalupe Alvarez-SotoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
  5. State v. AvilaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API