State of Arizona v. Nicholas Olaf Kjolsrud, Loni Kay Kambitsch
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge:
¶ 1 Appellees Loni Kambitsch and Nicholas Kjolsrud were charged with multiple drug-related offenses based on drugs and drug paraphernalia seized from their vehicle after a traffic stop. Relying, in part, on Rodriguez v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1609, 191 L.Ed.2d 492 (2015), the trial court granted Kambitsch and Kjolsrud’s motion to suppress the drug evidence, finding continued detention by a sheriffs deputy to conduct a drug-detection-dog investigation after the completed traffic stop was not based on reasonable suspicion. The state dismissed the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Kyle Andrew StollCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2018
- State v. UrreaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State of Arizona v. Asalia Guadalupe Alvarez-SotoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
- State v. AvilaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.