Legal Opinion
Inacom Corp., a Delaware Corporation v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, a New York Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 13, 2001No. 99-3085PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Following trial, a jury found that Sears, Roebuck and Company (Sears) had committed the tort of fraudulent concealment against Inacom Corporation (Inacom) and had breached a contract with Inacom. The jury awarded Inacom over $4.1 million in damages. The district court 2 awarded Sears over $1 million on its counterclaim and entered judgment in favor of Inacom for the difference. Sears appeals, and we affirm.
I
“We review the trial evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict.” Jarrett v. ERC Props., Inc., 211 F.3d 1078, 1080 (8th Cir.2000). Inacom, a company…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Thaddeus C. Pulla, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Amoco Oil Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Jodie Henderson v. Simmons Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Eckert v. Titan Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Russell Knowles v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Tracker Marine, L.P. v. Ogle, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- In re Mercedes-Benz Tele Aid Contract LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Murphy v. FedEx National LTL, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.