Legal Opinion
In re Mercedes-Benz Tele Aid Contract Litigation
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 24, 2009No. Civ. No. 07-2720(DRD); MDL No. 1914PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DEBEVOISE, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on a motion by Plaintiffs,1 individuals who purchased model year 2002-2006 automobiles manufactured and marketed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz U.S.A., LLC (“Mercedes”), for certification as a class pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. Mercedes, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Montvale, New Jersey, is responsible for the marketing and service of all Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold by authorized dealers in the United States. Because the amount in controversy exceeds $5,000,000 and at…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Snyder v. FARNAM COMPANIES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Arcand v. Brother International Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Maniscalco v. Brother International (USA) Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- ARLANDSON v. Hartz Mountain Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.