Legal Opinion

Taitch v. Lavoy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1961No. 35438PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment against them for $715, plus 12 per cent interest. The ultimate question is whether the obligation had been discharged in bankruptcy.

November 26,1952, defendant D. R. Lavoy signed a memorandum which states he acted as broker in a transaction whereby plaintiff purchased certain real property in Spokane. Further, the memorandum states:

“ . . . In the course of the sale the undersigned converted to his own use $500.00 belonging to Eudell Taitch [plaintiff] which was contrary [to] his duties as a broker & contrary to understanding of Taitch.
“Lavoy acknowledges his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Guernsey-Newton Co. v. NapierWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. In Re the Contempt of PulverWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Zerega Distributing Co. v. GoughWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Nichols v. DoakWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Rustuen v. AproWashington Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. Middlesex Insurance Co. v. Koritz (In Re Koritz)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
  3. Zook v. BaierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Schlecht v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Cusick v. PhillippiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API