Legal Opinion

Middlesex Insurance Co. v. Koritz (In Re Koritz)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 3, 1979No. 15-13108PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ON DISCHARGEABILITY

HAROLD LAVIEN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Plaintiff’s amended complaint seeks a determination that a debt due it from the bankrupt is non-dischargeable under Bankruptcy Act Section 17a(4), 11 U.S.C. § 35(a)(4) 1 because of the bankrupt’s fraud while acting in a fiduciary capacity towards the plaintiff.

The following facts are relevant to the procedural aspects of the case.

In the notice for first meeting of creditors the Court, in two distinct sentences, fixed November 20,1978 as the last date for filing complaints for objecting to discharge and to determine…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. HerbstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re FigueroaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  2. Matter of HeywardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  3. Truax & Hovey, Ltd. v. Grosso (In Re Grosso)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1981
  4. In Re KirschnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  5. In Re KleinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API