Legal Opinion

In Re the Contempt of Pulver

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1928No. 20952. Department OnePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This controversy. first came into this court as a prohibition proceeding on the relation of Earl E. Pulver and Minnie C. Pulver, his wife, looking to the prohibiting of the enforcement of orders of the superior court for King county adjudging them to.be in contempt of that court, and committing them to jail until they submit to examination and answer inquiries touching their property and finances in a supplemental proceeding pending in that court looking to the collection of a judgment rendered therein against Earl E. Pulver and their marital community. Before the prohibition proceeding was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strang v. BradnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Friend v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Forsyth v. VehmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Commonwealth v. LangleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Frank v. Michigan Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. O'DONOGHUE v. RiggsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Fitzgerald v. HerzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Portland Ass'n of Credit Men, Inc. v. EarleyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Guernsey-Newton Co. v. NapierWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Citizens Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API