Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Board of Registered Nursing
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 16, 2012No. D060622PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IRION, J.
Kim Rachel Hansen filed a petition for writ of administrative mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) to challenge the decision of the Board of Registered Nursing (the Board) to revoke her registered nurse license (hereafter license). On the Board’s demurrer, the trial court ruled the petition was untimely; and after Hansen did not amend within the time allotted, the court entered a judgment dismissing the petition with prejudice.
Hansen appeals, contending she did not learn of the revocation until after the limitations period for filing the petition had expired. We affirm.
I
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Ochoa v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Quarry v. Doe ICalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Bonnell v. Medical Bd. of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Saint Francis Mem'l Hosp. v. Cal. Dep't of Pub. Health, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Happy Nails & Spa v. SuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Saint Francis Memorial Hospital v. State Dept. of Public HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- St. Francis Mem. Hosp. v. CA Dept. of Pub.HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Ventura Coastal v. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2020