Legal Opinion · Dissent

California Grocers Assn. v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2011No. S176099Published

1Dissent

GRIMES, J.,* Dissenting.

I respectfully dissent, finding City of Los Angeles Ordinance No. 177231 is preempted by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) (29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.).

In my view, the ordinance intrudes on the collective bargaining process in an extraordinary and fundamental way, at its very source. It determines the individual workers who will comprise a new employer’s workforce for the first 90 days of its operation. During those 90 days, the new employer must provide employment to a group of workers it did not choose. In addition, the new employer must provide to this mandated…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API