Legal Opinion

State v. Laabs

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1968No. State 12PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The defendant and his brother were charged with the same offense. At the conclusion of the state’s case, the trial court granted a motion to dismiss the action against the brother but denied a motion to dismiss the case against the defendant. The defendant was secretary-treasurer of both Laabs Dairy Company and the Laabs Cheese Company. Dairy plants must be licensed by the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture. Licensing is an annual procedure and sec. 100.06 (2), Stats., requires each license application to be aceom- panied by a sworn statement of the business operation and financial condition…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. NutleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. BrodsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Pollack v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lampkins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Court v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Thomas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. McKissick v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. ClarkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API