State v. Clarke
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
Defendant claims numerous errors or abuses of discretion which he contends made his conviction a manifest injustice.
Did the court abuse its discretion by denying defendant’s motion for a change of venue
Prior to trial and pursuant to sec. 956.03, Stats., the defendant moved for a change of the place of trial. Sec. 956.03 (3), provides:
“Community Prejudice. If a defendant who is charged with a felony files his affidavit that an impartial trial cannot be had in the county, the court may change the venue of the action to any county where an impartial trial can be had. . . .”
Attached to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Peterson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Lampkins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Court v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- May v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.