(PC) Ausborn v. CHCF
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDY AUSBORN, No. 2:20-cv-593 EFB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CHCF, et. al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. In addition to filing two complaints (ECF Nos. 1, 5), he has also filed two 19 applications to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2, 6). The court grants the first application 20 and deny the latter as moot. Further, for the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s first amended 21 complaint is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.