Kraft v. Tennigkeit
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.
Plaintiffs and defendant are adjoining landowners. The legal quarrel between them has to do with the true boundary line between their respective parcels of land. The immediate provocation was the alleged interference by defendant with the partition fence on the said line.
Plaintiffs commenced this action by filing a petitibir for a temporary injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering with a fence which plaintiffs claim is on the true line which marks the boundary between the land owned by . . the respective parties. Defendant answered by . .... general denial, and he also filed a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Becker v. DonalsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Williams v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Produce Refrigerating Co. v. Norwich Union Fire Insurance SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Carpenter v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Pool v. HennessySupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Central Life Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Concannon v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- First National Bank in Cedar Falls v. ClaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Schipper & Block, Inc. v. Carson Pirie Scott & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Scott v. Arden Farms Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.