Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Gwinn
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1981No. 15060PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEELY, Justice:
In this original habeas corpus we are asked to determine the scope of a probationer’s constitutional rights before a probation revocation proceeding has been initiated. Specifically, we are asked to consider: (1) when the right to counsel attaches; (2) whether there is the right to be advised of constitutional rights pursuant to the mandate of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); and, (3) the degree of protection afforded probationers from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Christine E. Hughes pled guilty to the offense of passing a forged…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miller v. TolerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
- Marrs v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Scott v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- People ex rel. Maiello v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.