Legal Opinion

Copeco, Inc. v. Caley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1994No. 1993-0399Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 69 Ohio St.3d 79.] COPECO, INC., APPELLEE, v. CALEY ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Copeco, Inc. v. Caley,

1994-Ohio-36.] Appellate procedure—Supreme Court jurisdiction—Actual conflict between appellate districts on rule of law must exist before certification of conflict is proper—Journal entry certifying conflict must clearly set forth rule of law upon which alleged conflict exists. (No. 93-399—Submitted March 23, 1994—Decided April 27, 1994.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. CA-8776. __________________ Ronald G.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Whitelock v. Gilbane Building Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. SFZ Transportation, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. ParobekOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. PaliderOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Cook v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API