Legal Opinion

Poliakoff v. Shelton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 8, 1940No. 15057PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of Judge Oxner follows:

At the conclusion of the evidence, defendant made a motion for a directed verdict which, by consent of counsel, was taken under advisement, and argued before me on January 23, 1939. Briefly stated, said motion was upon the ground that the plaintiff failed to show any actionable negligence on the part of the defendant.

Most of the testimony related to the nature and extent of the alleged injuries sustained by plaintiff. The testimony as to how the alleged injury occurred is unusually brief and incomplete. The testimony offered by the plaintiff showing how her injury…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Saunders v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Saunders v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Morris v. . the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Durst v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  5. Anderson v. South Carolina & Georgia R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lola Rabon v. Guardsmark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  2. Robinson v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  3. Hurd v. Williamsburg CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Merritt v. Interstate Transit LinesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  5. Squires v. HendersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API