Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 26, 2020No. 64/19PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Darrayl John Wilson, No. 64, September Term, 2019 WITNESS TAMPERING – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE – SPOUSAL TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGE – MERGER – Court of Appeals held that, where person married potential witness for State with intent to have witness invoke spousal testimonial privilege to prevent witness from testifying at criminal proceeding, evidence was sufficient to support convictions for witness tampering and obstruction of justice. Consistent with holding in Romans v. State, 178 Md. 588,

16 A.2d 642

(1940), cert. denied,

312 U.S. 695

(1941), and in accord with determinations of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Arthur Andersen LLP v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. United States v. William J. CintoloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. Dutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  4. United States v. Raymond J. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Lester Irvin ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Beckwitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. State v. KrikstanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  3. White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Koushall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API