Legal Opinion

Michel v. Michel

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 18, 1993No. 10852PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court in this action for dissolution of marriage. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly ordered him to maintain life insurance without any evidence of (1) the availability of such insurance, (2) the cost of such insurance and (3) his insurability. We agree with the plaintiff, reverse the trial court’s financial orders and remand the matter to the trial court for a new trial.1

The parties were married on February 28, 1987. There were two minor children issue of the marriage at the time of the dissolution. On November 8, 1991,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Ehrenkranz v. EhrenkranzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. Broaca v. BroacaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Wolk v. WolkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Paddock v. PaddockConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wolf v. WolfConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. Lake v. LakeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Porter v. PorterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Quindazzi v. QuindazziConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Panganiban v. PanganibanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API