Lake v. Lake
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiff, Daniel F. Lake, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to the defendant, Rose Marie Lake. He claims that the trial court improperly ordered him to obtain and to maintain life and medical insurance for the benefit of the defendant as part of the judgment of dissolution. We agree and reverse the judgment of the trial court in part.
I
The plaintiff first claims that the trial court did not have sufficient evidence before it regarding the cost and availability of life insurance and, therefore, in accordance with our holding in Michel…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Ehrenkranz v. EhrenkranzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Beede v. BeedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Sweet v. SweetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Broaca v. BroacaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bee v. BeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Porter v. PorterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Parley v. ParleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Wilkes v. WilkesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Kunajukr v. KunajukrConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.