Stanley v. Gallegos
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
The federal civil-rights statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, authorizes suits against persons acting under color of state law for violations of rights granted by federal law. But under modern doctrine the defendant is not personally liable in damages for every violation of such rights. Wary of the damage to public welfare if government officers were deterred and distracted from vigorous performance of their duties by excessive exposure to litigation, the courts have provided them qualified immunity from suit despite their violations of federal law unless the unlawfulness of their…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cummings v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- The Estate of Marquette F. Cummings Jr. v. Warden Carter DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Malone v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Ronald Ryan Shepard, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- AerSale, Inc. v. The City of Roswell, New MexicoDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.