Legal Opinion
Bock v. Gold
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 10, 2008No. 2006-276PublishedCited by 158 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Plaintiff Gordon Bock appeals from the superior court’s dismissal of his complaint for failure to state a claim. The procedural history may be briefly stated. Plaintiffs amended complaint against several named Department of Corrections (DOC) employees alleged four common-law causes of action — assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress — and a claim arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants moved to dismiss, contending that plaintiffs amended complaint failed to state a claim. V.R.C.P. 12(b)(6). The trial court granted the motion in May 2006,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- Darryl R. Montague v. Hundred Acre Homestead, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
- Mahoney v. Tara, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Prive v. Vermont Asbestos GroupSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Murray v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.