Legal Opinion

Prive v. Vermont Asbestos Group

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 14, 2010No. 2008-474PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.

¶ 1. Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his complaint against defendant Howard Manosh. The original complaint listed Vermont Asbestos Group (VAG) as the only defendant. Plaintiff subsequently filed proposed amendments to his complaint to add as a defendant the president and CEO of VAG, Howard Manosh. Plaintiff stated that Manosh was personally liable for the alleged trespass and nuisance claims. After one of plaintiffs motions to amend was granted, Manosh filed a motion to dismiss to remove his name from the lawsuit and to hold that the entire claim was barred under the applicable statutes of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Colby v. Umbrella, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. Bock v. GoldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. Louis Lobato v. Pay Less Drug Stores, Inc., a Corporation Abe B. Cohen, James L. Grady, Charles Finke, and Burt RosenburgCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  4. Crigler v. SalacSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Amiot v. AmesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Dernier v. Mortgage Network, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  2. Mahoney v. Tara, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. Campbell v. StaffordSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. Kaleb Vasseur v. State of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  5. Deutsche Bank v. Kevin PinetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API