Legal Opinion

In Re Sherman

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided November 8, 1935PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL, District Judge.

The above-named debtors filed in this court their petitions under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended by the Act of June 28, 1934, 48 Stat. 1289 (known as the Frazier-Lemke Amendment). Having failed to reach agreements with their creditors for any composition or extension of their indebtedness, they filed their amended petitions invoking the remedies of subsection (s) of section 75, and proceedings thereon were pending at the time of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Louisville Bank v. Radford, 295 U. S. 555, 55 S. Ct. 854,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank of RoanokeSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States Nat. Bank of Omaha, Neb. v. PampCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. MacH v. TRIPLE D SUPPLY, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
  4. In Re SchaefferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936
  5. Wright v. Union Cent. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API