Legal Opinion

New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Ostman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1896No. 17,434PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From tlie Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, C. J.

Appellee commenced this action in the lower court to recover damages of appellant,arising out of the death of her decedent, Charles Ostman, by reason of the alleged negligence of the railroad company. The deceased was the husband of appellee, and the fatal accident which resulted in his death, occurred on April 8, 1891, at Burr Oak, a station on appellant’s line of railway. There was a special verdict returned by the jury, upon which the court rendered its judgment, in favor of the appellee, for $4,000.00, the amount assessed by the jury. Among the errors assigned by the appellant is one…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Jenney Electric Light & Power Co. v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Lovejoy v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Muldowney v. Illinois Central R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. HamlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. S. W. Little Coal Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PerkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HaasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Indiana, Illinois & Iowa Railroad v. BundyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API