Legal Opinion

Carroll Township v. Jones

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1984No. Appeal, No. 3042 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Because we have permitted the appeal of an inter* locutory question certified by the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County, in an eminent domain proceeding initiated by a landowners ’ petition for appointment of viewers, which averred a de facto taking of their alleged right-of-way by Carroll Township’s demolition of a bridge across a creek, we must determine if the township bypassed the issue of the landowners’ alleged lack of right-of-way interest, when the township did not raise that question in preliminary objections to the petition for appointment of viewers.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Melnick v. MelnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. City of Philadelphia v. Airportels, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. Harrisburg Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nardi v. Delaware River Port AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Bernstein AppealCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Marx Stationery & Printing Co. v. Redevelopment Authority of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. In re: Condemnation by the CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. BerkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API