Legal Opinion

Flores-Andrade v. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 3, 2016No. 15-3160Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Luis Flores-Andrade, a 45-year-old Mexican citizen, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s denial of his request for cancellation of removal, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). The Board agreed with the IJ’s conclusion that Flores-An-drade was ineligible for relief because he had left the United States for more than 90 days, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(2). Flores-Andrade contends that he returned before the 90-day cutoff. We dismiss Flores-Andrade’s petition for review in part for lack of jurisdiction and deny the remainder of the petition.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leguizamo-Medina v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Barradas v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Maria Pouhova v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Raul Antia-Perea v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Bayanmunkh Darinchuluun v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API