Legal Opinion
Bayanmunkh Darinchuluun v. Loretta E. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 8, 2015No. 14-2212PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Bayanmunkh Darinchuluun filed an application for asylum in which he claimed that he had been persecuted in his native Mongolia as a result of his attempts to bring to light an illegal smuggling operation. Following a hearing, an immigration judge (“IJ”) found that Mr. Darinchuluun was credible, but that he had failed to offer sufficient corroborating evidence to substantiate his claims. The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) similarly denied Mr. Darinchuluun relief and also denied his request for a remand so that he could supplement the administrative record.
The record…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- COELHOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1992
- Alberto Damaize-Job v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Ren v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Bredan Chima Chukwu v. Attorney General of the United States United States Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Yetunde Balogun v. John D. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Maria Arita-Deras v. Robert WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Silais v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Cojocari v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Daniiar Santashbekov v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Rigoberto Velasquez-Banegas v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.