Legal Opinion
Galustian v. Peter
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided November 9, 2010No. Action 2:08cv59PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on several outstanding motions from each of the parties. On April 16, 2010, defendant Lawrence T. Peter (“Peter”) filed a Motion to Drop defendant Col. John J. Holly (“Holly”) from this litigation, claiming the court lacked personal jurisdiction over Holly and the claims against Holly are time-barred. In that Motion, Peter also moved to dismiss the Verified First Amended Complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) on the grounds of forum non conveniens or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harris v. KELLOGG, BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- GALUSTIAN v. PeterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Harris v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011