Legal Opinion
Harris v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 17, 2011No. Civil Action No. 08-563PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this Memorandum Opinion, the Court addresses the narrow question of whether Iraqi law should be applied to certain of Plaintiffs Cheryl Harris and Douglas Maseth’s (“Plaintiffs”) claims in this case, as requested by Defendant Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc. (“KBR”). KBR’s motion for the application of Iraqi law has been fully briefed and the Court has entertained oral argument from counsel. (Docket Nos. 215, 216, 218, 221, 229, 231). The parties have also supplied the Court with evidence of the potentially applicable…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harris v. KELLOGG, BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011