Legal Opinion
United States v. Balanovski
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 14, 1956No. 23853_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
236 F.2d 298
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Israel BALANOVSKI, Samuel Bernardo Horenstein, Compania Argentina de Intercambio Comercial, I. Balanovski & Cia. (sometimes called "CADIC"), a copartnership, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 369.
Docket 23853.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued June 4, 1956.
Decided August 14, 1956.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Donald L. Stumpf, New York City (Sandow Holman, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellants.
Maurice N. Nessen, Asst. U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y., New York City (Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty., and Arthur B. Kramer,…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- McQuillen v. National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Fahey v. O'Melveny & Myers Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. O'Melveny & MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Standard Casing Co. v. . California Casing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Anderson v. BensonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1953
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. NubarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Focus Media Inc., Debtor, Thomas E. Rubin v. John P. Pringle, Chapter 7 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Minichiello v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
- Haley v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- Ms. Interpret v. Rawe Druck—Und—Veredlungs—GmbH (In Re Ms. Interpret)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.