Legal Opinion
Charles O. Ross v. Honorable Frank Reda, Judge, Franklin County Municipal Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 13, 1975No. 74--1771PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order denying the application of Charles O. Ross for a writ of habeas corpus. It is contended that refusal of the Ohio State trial court to admit out-of-state counsel pro hac vice 1 to represent Ross at his trial in that court deprived Ross of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The out-of-state attorney had been licensed to practice in other jurisdictions, but was not licensed to practice in Ohio. Reference is made to the decisions of the Ohio Court of Appeals in State v. Ross, 36 Ohio App.2d 185, 304 N.E.2d 396 (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 904, 94 S.Ct. 1397,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cohen v. HurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. KAVANAUGHSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Irene R. Thomas, and Benedict F. Fitzgerald v. Billie Smith CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- State v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Roy W. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Roy Wilson v. Barry MintzesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Bundy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.