Legal Opinion
Gas Sensing Tech. Corp. v. Ashton
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided October 21, 2018No. Case No: 18-CV-95-FPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
NANCY D. FREUDENTHAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter is before the Court on several motions made by the parties, including Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. The Court has considered the evidence, motions, responses, and replies, and is fully informed in the premises. For the following reasons, the Court finds and Orders Plaintiff's Motion for Remand (Doc. 20) is DENIED; John Dugald Mactaggart's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) is GRANTED; Defendants Quentin Morgan and Ewan Meldrum's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 35) is GRANTED as to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gas Sensing Technology Corp. v. AshtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020