Legal Opinion

Thieltges v. Royal Alliance Associates, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 2014No. DA 14-0120PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKINNON

¶1 This is the consolidated appeal of orders granting summary judgment in favor of Royal Alliance Associates, Inc., with respect to claims brought by Chevallier Ranch Company, Schindler Livestock, and Richard Thieltges, individually and on behalf of Thieltges Farms, Inc.

¶2 The issue presented for review is whether the facts constituting Appellants’ claims against Royal Alliance were, by their nature, concealed or self-concealing such that they could not have been discovered in the exercise of due diligence.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶3 Chevallier and Schindler are Montana ranching…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Bennett v. Dow Chemical Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Draggin' Y Cattle Co. v. AddinkMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Redding v. Montana First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garza v. Forquest Ventures, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Bobby Francis Lowry v. Seeleylake.com; Vince Lovato, Editor; and John Does 1-10District Court, D. Montana · 2026
  3. Margitan v. McAfeeMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Tummarello v. State of Montana Department of Health and Human Services Child Support Enforcement DivisionDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API