Garza v. Forquest Ventures, Inc.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker
¶1 Forquest Ventures, Inc., Ken Hagman, and Allison Hagman (collectively Forquest) appeal the Order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, granting Appellees’ 2 motion for summary judgment and dismissing Advanced Analytical, LLC, for lack of personal jurisdiction. We address the following issues on appeal:
1. Whether the District Court correctly determined that Investors timely asserted their claims under the Montana Securities Act, § 30-10-307(5)(b), MCA;
2. Whether the District Court correctly determined that the non-Garza Investors’ claims relate bach to the original…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Merck & Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Azure Ex Rel. Marchington v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Tynes v. Bankers Life Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
- Milky Whey, Inc. v. Dairy Partners, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Folsom v. Montana Public Employees' Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- Deleon v. BNSF Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
- Junkermier, Clark, Campanella, Stevens, P.C. v. Alborn, Uithoven, Riekenberg, P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
- McClure v. McClureMontana Supreme Court · 2016
- Folsom V.Whitefish Police MPEAMontana Supreme Court · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.