Legal Opinion

Garza v. Forquest Ventures, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2015No. DA 14-0666PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 Forquest Ventures, Inc., Ken Hagman, and Allison Hagman (collectively Forquest) appeal the Order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, granting Appellees’ 2 motion for summary judgment and dismissing Advanced Analytical, LLC, for lack of personal jurisdiction. We address the following issues on appeal:

1. Whether the District Court correctly determined that Investors timely asserted their claims under the Montana Securities Act, § 30-10-307(5)(b), MCA;

2. Whether the District Court correctly determined that the non-Garza Investors’ claims relate bach to the original…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Merck & Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Azure Ex Rel. Marchington v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Tynes v. Bankers Life Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Milky Whey, Inc. v. Dairy Partners, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Montana Public Employees' Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Deleon v. BNSF Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Junkermier, Clark, Campanella, Stevens, P.C. v. Alborn, Uithoven, Riekenberg, P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. McClure v. McClureMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Folsom V.Whitefish Police MPEAMontana Supreme Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API