Legal Opinion

Clark v. . Maxwell, Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1929PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

The only question presented for decision by this appeal is whether the statute under which plaintiff has been required to pay a license tax for the privilege of engaging in the business of operating a motor-propelled truck for the transportation of property over the public highways of this State, for compensation, is in violation of section 3,of Article V of the Constitution of North Carolina, or of section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

Plaintiff contends that the license tax which he has been required to pay under the provisions of the statute is not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Brown-Forman Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Caldwell Land & Lumber Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Leonard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Maxwell v. Kent-Coffey Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. State v. . LockeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. American Equitable Assurance Co. of NY v. GoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Tea Co. v. . Maxwell, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API