North v. . Bunn
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil action tried at Fall Term, 1897, of Transylvania Superior Court before Norwood, «/., and a jury. There was a verdict for the plaintiffs, and from the judgment thereon the defendants appealed. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Faircloth, C. J.:
This is an action for possession of land and damages, etc. The case is stated as follows : ‘£ The plaintiffs introduced in evidence a regular chain of title from the State to the feme plaintiff, Sophie E. North, and showed the defendants to be in possession of that part of the land laid down on the map as forming' a triangle and represented by the figures “ 1, ” “ 2 ” and “3,” and offered evidence as to the value of the rents and profits, and here closed their case.
“The defendants thereupon offered to prove by the defendant, Kitty Bunn, that she went into possession of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burns v. . McGregorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Dunn v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1844
- Vann v. . NewsomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
3Cited by12 opinions
- Luton v. Badham.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Mulheron v. Henry S. Koppin Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Estate of Lapinsky v. SparacinoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
- Vick v. . VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Harris v. OrrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.