Legal Opinion

Sheehan v. Ruben

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 16, 1951No. 33383Published

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The question here for this court to decide is: Did the common-law action filed by the plaintiff in the circumstances above set forth from the record, comply with the requirements of a declaration in attachment? The plaintiff in error says: “Yes.” The defendant in error says, “No.” Let us endeavor to determine what the law is.

The record does not reveal whether the attachment or the common-law action was filed first. The plaintiff contends that they were filed simultaneously. Attachment proceedings do not grow out of the common law. Such proceedings are statutory. When attachment proceedings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dollar v. Fred W. Amend Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Kennon & Klink v. Evans, Gardner & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1867
  3. Mosely v. King Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API