Legal Opinion

Mosely v. King Hardware Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 1917No. 8017PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Bell. October 6, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

1. There was no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in denying the motion to set aside the judgment and reinstate the ease, on the ground that the judgment was rendered in the absence of the defendant and her attorney. The evidence was amply sufficient to support a finding that the defendant was lacking in diligence.

2. The objection that no declaration in attachment was filed is without merit. There was attached to the original attachment in this case a complete itemized statement of the account sued upon, as well as a copy of the contract of sale covering the various items…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. West v. Gainesville National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Cochran Furniture Co. v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Sheehan v. RubenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API