Legal Opinion

Aaron v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided June 25, 2007No. 3:03-CV-656-RMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MILLER, Chief Judge.

Jim Aaron filed this diversity action against Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, and Susan Mahl a/k/a Susan Scott to in an attempt to obtain certain account funds that Merrill Lynch holds for the benefit of Ms. Scott. The case is essentially a dispute between Mr. Aaron and Ms. Scott, but because Merrill Lynch holds the disputed funds, Mr. Aaron also claimed Merrill Lynch was independently liable for damages he suffered as a result of its wanton refusal to turn the funds over. Mr. Aaron moved for summary judgment on his claim Merrill Lynch acted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. KraftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. Indianapolis Downs, LLC v. HerrIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Indianapolis Colts v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, and Capital Improvement Board of Managers of Marion CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Kurt Froebel v. George E. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC v. Bank of ChinaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston v. MeadeDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Emma Juhnke, et al.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026
  3. USAA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CYRANEKDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API