Legal Opinion
State v. Connelly
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 20, 1984No. 12164PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment of the trial court ordering the forfeiture to the state of his 1981 Lincoln Continental automobile pursuant to General Statutes § 54-33g (c).1 The only claim of error which the defendant has briefed is that the forfeiture was improper because of the failure of the trial court in the original memorandum of decision to find that the automobile had been used or was intended to be used in violation of a criminal statute as required by § 54-33g (c). After the defendant’s brief was filed, on motion of the state to rectify, the trial court corrected the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. One 1975 Mercedes 280SCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Associates Investment Company, Intervenor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. One 1976 Porsche 911SCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. One 1957 Oldsmobile Automobile, Motor No. A227445, and General Motors Acceptance Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Scott C. Ciak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- State v. One 1977 Buick AutomobileSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. One 1981 BMW AutomobileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- State v. McCarthyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- State v. One 1983 Black Toyota Pickup, VIN JT4RN48S6D0065995South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.