Legal Opinion
Powell v. Dayton, Sheridan & Grand Ronde R. R.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1888PublishedCited by 19 opinions
Appeal from Yamhill County.
1Opinion of the CourtLord, C. J.
This is an action to recover damages for waste. The defendant went into possession of the described premises under the following instrument: —
“ That said Powell hath and doth hereby let and lease to the said railroad company his warehouse property, together with all the rights, privileges, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situated in the town of Dayton, Yamhill County, Oregon, and more 'particularly described as follows: Lots Nos. five (5) and six (6), and lots Nos. thirty (30), thirty-one (31), thirty-two (32), and thirty-three (33), in the-of said town of Dayton, as laid out and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. BostwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Cook v. Champlain Transportation Co.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Agate v. . LowenbeinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Davenport v. MagoonOregon Supreme Court · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Keogh v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- D. L. Fair Lumber Co. v. WeemsMississippi Supreme Court · 1944
- Sorrells v. McNallySupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Zimmerman v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Fleischner v. Citizens' Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.