Anushevitz v. Warden, Nevada State Prison
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Mowbray, J.:
These two cases have been consolidated for the purposes of appeal, because the same issue is involved in each case.
The appellant-petitioners, Walter Paul Anushevitz and Tracy Bosley, commenced habeas proceedings in the district court under Nevada’s Post-Conviction Relief Statute, NRS 177.315. 1 Both petitioners had been charged with felonies. 2 Each defendant pleaded guilty as charged. They were both represented by counsel at all stages of the proceedings. 3 Appellants concede that the record shows that their pleas were intelligently and voluntarily made. 4 The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Anthony Joseph Munich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Higby v. Sheriff of Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Thomas v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1999
- Palmer v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Stocks v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Little v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.