Legal Opinion
Ceridian Corp. v. SCSC Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 5, 1999No. Civ. 3-91-716RHK/JMMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Before the Court are Objections to the February 9, 1999 Report and Recommendation (R & R) of Magistrate Judge John M. Mason. In the R & R, Judge Mason recommended that:
1. Ceridian’s Motion to Compel Disclosure from Judgment Garnishees (Doc. No. 134) be denied;
2. Tower Insurance Company’s Motion to Discharge Garnishment (Doc. No. 141) be denied without prejudice; and
3. Ceridian’s “Contingent Motion for Relief from Discharge of Judgment Garnishees” (Doc. No. 148) be denied.
Although there is a disagreement between the parties as to whether the R & R addressed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Joseph L. Koehnen v. Herald Fire Insurance Company, Defendant/garnishee--Appellee, Rachel Sarah PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Susie Randolph v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Stoll v. Hawkeye Casualty Co. Of Des Moines, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ceridian Corporation v. Scsc CorpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Reko v. Creative Promotions, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Ceridian Corporation v. Allied Mutual Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Nordstrom v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002